Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're guided with the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing in the present case. In this sort of circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable and it is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity in the offense demands the most stringent punishment, contemplating the sanctity of human life and deterrence for opportunity offenders.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it acceptable towards the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified because of the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal tips or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed on the court in which the case is or will be filed.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID expected) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts to the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Permit’s center on what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as being a foster child. Even though the couple had two young children of their very own at home, the social worker did not inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement during the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had youthful children.
I) The above referred case FIR, to the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered over the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who's father of your petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner can be an eyewkness from the prevalence.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses such as self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which might cause reduced charges or acquittal.
10. Without touching the merits in the case on the issue of yearly increases in the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision with the provincial government, this kind of yearly increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, involves further assessment to be made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only completed In the event the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting click here WhatsApp
fourteen. From the light of your position explained earlier mentioned, it really is concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded as for no fault of his personal and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the duration of service or while in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more